Rules on Non-Muslim Members Among 14 Changes to Waqf Amendment Bill

The Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) has approved 14 modifications to the draft Waqf Amendment Bill, introduced in the Lok Sabha last August. The bill, which proposes significant changes in managing Muslim charitable properties, has drawn considerable debate and scrutiny.

Among the approved changes is a key provision mandating at least two non-Muslim members in waqf councils, in addition to potential non-Muslim ex-officio members. This ensures broader representation within waqf management at both state and national levels.

Another notable amendment shifts the authority to decide whether a property is classified as 'waqf' from District Collectors to state-nominated officers. Additionally, the legislation will not apply retrospectively, protecting properties already registered under existing laws. However, Congress leader Imran Masood flagged concerns, pointing out that 90% of waqf properties remain unregistered.

Proposals and Rejections
The approved amendments, many proposed by BJP MPs Nishikant Dubey, Tejasvi Surya, and Aparajita Sarangi, include a provision requiring individuals donating land to demonstrate at least five years of practicing Islam. This measure aims to ensure the authenticity of such dedications.

Out of 67 proposals submitted—23 by ruling party MPs and 44 by opposition members—none of the opposition’s suggestions were accepted. The rejection followed a 10:16 vote along party lines, with BJP and allied members holding the majority in the JPC.

Contentious Reforms
The opposition, led by AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi and DMK MP Kanimozhi, has strongly criticized the amendments, labeling them a "direct attack on freedom of religion." Concerns have been raised over potential violations of constitutional protections, including Articles 15 and 30, which safeguard religious freedom and minority rights.

Voting to confirm the 14 amendments is scheduled for January 29, with the final report expected by January 31.

The proposed changes aim to address longstanding issues, including empowering Muslim women under waqf laws. However, critics argue that the amendments could compromise the autonomy of waqf boards and religious freedoms.