Top Court Allows Ranveer Allahbadia To Resume Show, Questions Centre on Digital Content Regulation

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today emphasized the need to strike a balance between morality and freedom of expression, directing the Centre to consider this while framing guidelines for digital content. The remarks came amid the controversy surrounding YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia, popularly known as "The BeerBiceps Guy," who was previously restrained from hosting his podcast after making inappropriate remarks on a roast show.

The 31-year-old content creator has now been allowed to resume his podcast, The Ranveer Show, on the condition that he provides an undertaking ensuring his content adheres to moral standards, making it suitable for audiences of all age groups.

Background of the Controversy

Ranveer Allahbadia found himself at the center of a heated debate last month after making an offensive remark on the roast show India's Got Latent, hosted by comedian Samay Raina. During the episode, Allahbadia posed an inappropriate question to a contestant, sparking widespread backlash on social media. Critics argued that such remarks crossed the line between humor and vulgarity.

A video of the incident went viral, leading to multiple police complaints against Allahbadia, Raina, and others associated with the show. The controversy ignited discussions on the boundaries of free speech and the need for regulatory oversight on digital platforms.

Apology and Legal Developments

Following the outrage, Allahbadia issued a public apology, admitting his mistake. Posting a video message on X (formerly Twitter), he stated:

"My comment wasn't just inappropriate, it was not even funny. Comedy is not my forte. I am here to say sorry."

He further assured his audience that he does not intend to use his platform for such content in the future.

In court, Allahbadia’s lawyer, Abhinav Chandrachud, pleaded for the lifting of restrictions on The Ranveer Show, arguing that the show provides employment to nearly 280 people. The Supreme Court, while granting relief, underscored that digital content creators must operate within ethical boundaries.

Government's Stand and Supreme Court’s Observations

Appearing for the Centre, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta criticized Allahbadia’s remarks, categorizing them as "not vulgar, but perverse." He pointed out that there is a distinction between humor, vulgarity, and outright perversion.

"Even legal professionals and judges would find it uncomfortable to watch together. Let him stay quiet for some time," he remarked.

Justice Surya Kant, heading the bench alongside Justice N Kotiswar Singh, acknowledged the growing discourse on free speech but reiterated that every fundamental right comes with corresponding duties and restrictions.

"We do not want censorship, but digital platforms cannot be free-for-all spaces either," the court observed.

The bench further stated that offensive language does not equate to talent.

"There are renowned humorists who produce content that can be watched by an entire family. That is true talent. Using filthy language is not," Justice Kant said.

Call for Digital Content Guidelines

The Supreme Court urged the government to introduce measures that uphold free speech while maintaining moral standards. The court suggested that any regulatory measures should be subject to public consultation, involving content creators, legal experts, and other stakeholders.

"The Constitution allows for reasonable restrictions on speech in the interest of public order and morality. The regulatory approach should reflect the wisdom of the Constitution’s framers, ensuring content regulation without compromising fundamental rights," the bench stated.

The Solicitor General has been directed to propose draft regulatory measures, which will be made available for public input before any legislative action is taken.